Plan and manage an Azure AI solution 1.4 Implement responsible AI across generative AI and agentic systems

A team needs two custom evaluators (preview) in Foundry.

Study guide skill: Apply responsible AI instrumentation, including evaluators, safety evaluations, and explanation tooling

Question B6-011

A team needs two custom evaluators (preview) in Foundry. The first must check deterministically that every response contains a required disclaimer and stays under a word limit. The second must judge whether responses match the brand's tone. Which evaluator types should they create?

Select one answer.

  • A Code-based for the disclaimer and length check, and prompt-based for the brand tone ✓ Correct answer
  • B Prompt-based for the disclaimer and length check, and code-based for the brand tone
  • C Endpoint-based for both, because custom evaluators must call an external HTTP endpoint
  • D Prompt-based for both, because code-based evaluators can return only a Pass/Fail result

Answer: A

Code-based evaluators use a Python grade() function with deterministic logic and suit rule-based checks, format validation, and length limits; they return a float from 0.0 to 1.0. Prompt-based evaluators use a judge prompt and suit subjective judgments such as tone analysis. Endpoint-based evaluators are one of three types, for scoring logic hosted on your own infrastructure, not a requirement for every custom evaluator.

Deep dive

How it works

Foundry lets you create three types of custom evaluators (preview), and each fits a different kind of check:

  • Code-based: a Python grade() function scores each item with deterministic logic. Best for rule-based checks, keyword matching, format validation and length limits. It returns a single float from 0.0 to 1.0, where higher is better.
  • Prompt-based: a judge prompt tells an LLM how to score each item. Best for subjective quality judgments, semantic similarity and tone analysis. Scoring can be ordinal, continuous or binary, with a range you define.
  • Endpoint-based: an external HTTP endpoint receives evaluation data and returns scores. Best for custom scoring logic hosted on your own infrastructure, proprietary models, or pipelines that need network access.

So the disclaimer-plus-word-limit check is code-based (a string check and a word count, exactly repeatable), and brand tone is prompt-based. Microsoft names brand tone as a typical reason to build a custom evaluator.

One detail worth knowing: if grade() raises an exception or times out, that item is recorded as 0.0 and marked as an error in the evaluation report.

The other options, and when you'd use them

  • Prompt-based for the rules, code-based for tone: Reversed. Length limits and format checks are listed under code-based; tone analysis is listed under prompt-based.
  • Endpoint-based for both: Endpoint-based is one of three types, for scoring hosted on your own infrastructure. Custom evaluators don't have to call an endpoint.
  • Code-based returns only Pass/Fail: It returns a continuous float from 0.0 to 1.0.

Exam tip

Deterministic rule = code-based (grade(), 0.0 to 1.0). Subjective judgment = prompt-based. Your own service = endpoint-based.

References

Last reviewed:

Ready to test yourself? The quiz asks this and every other AI-103 question, with instant feedback. Practice this in a quiz →

All Plan and manage questions · AI-103 study guide

Thanks for your feedback!